NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.
Marlon L. Bayot ; John E. Lopes ; Muhammad Zubair ; Prisha Naidoo .
Last Update: January 26, 2024 .
Clinical laboratories are healthcare facilities providing a wide range of laboratory procedures that aid clinicians in diagnosing, treating, and managing patients.[1] These laboratories are manned by scientists trained to perform and analyze tests on samples of biological specimens collected from patients.
In addition, clinical laboratories may employ pathologists, clinical biochemists, laboratory assistants, laboratory managers, biomedical scientists, medical laboratory technicians, medical laboratory assistants, phlebotomists, and histology technicians.[2] Most clinical laboratories are situated within or near hospital facilities to provide access to clinicians and their patients.[1]
Classifications of clinical laboratories indicated below reveal that these facilities provide quality laboratory tests that are significant for addressing medical and public health needs.
The list below is non-exhaustive as new laboratory models are emerging:
Government (usually part of hospitals and medical centers under the Department of Pathology or Laboratory Medicine)
Private (part of a medical or healthcare institution) General clinical laboratories provide standard diagnostic laboratory tests Specialty laboratories provide less commonly used diagnostic and confirmatory tests Clinical chemistry Clinical Microbiology Hematology Blood banking and serology (ie, Immunohematology, Transfusion medicine) Histopathology and cytopathology Molecular biology Public health: providing tests such as water analysis and testing for environmental toxinsPeripheral laboratories provide routine screening, diagnostic (eg, conventional and rapid diagnostic tests), and follow-up tests for patients, usually within the local community[3]
May conduct additional tests than those provided in peripheral laboratories and can serve as referral laboratories for special cases.
Aside from performing tests, they perform management and supervisory tasks under specific areas of jurisdiction.[4]
Policy and program implementation Training and development Monitoring, evaluation, and research[1]In the past, the value of clinical laboratories as an integral part of the healthcare system was unrecognized.[5] Over time, more clinicians have recognized the need for laboratory tests to confirm their diagnoses and support monitoring patient response to therapy.[6] Aside from value to individual patients, clinical laboratories were also used for screening and surveillance of diseases. On a larger scale, program managers used some relevant tests as surrogate indicators to assess the progress of public, international, and global health programs.[7]
Laboratory networks were developed across countries and states to foster coordination and collaboration within the specified geographic areas.[8] Quality management systems within these laboratories have recently become significant issues, including standardization of laboratory services, strengthening laboratory systems, and developing new and rapid diagnostic tools. These issues are continually addressed by local and international health authorities and technical experts employing a patient-centered approach.
Clinical laboratories perform testing logically and strictly. Generally, there are 3 phases of the laboratory testing process that each facility should follow. Standard operating procedure manuals and job aids are written for guidance for each phase step: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical.[9] The pre-analytical phase is critical, with over 60% to 70% of laboratory errors occurring in this phase.[10]
Clinical laboratory professionals have embraced technology over the years to derive answers to clinical questions. Modern clinical laboratories use technologies, including spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectroscopy, cytometry, flame emission photometry, nephelometry, electrochemical, optical sensors, electrophoresis, and chromatography.
Spectrophotometry is a technique used to measure the absorbance of colored compounds in solution, helping to identify and quantify various substances in blood and body fluids.[11]
Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS): a vital tool in clinical analysis, enabling the measurement of metallic element concentrations within biological fluids and tissues like whole blood, plasma, urine, saliva, brain tissue, liver, hair, and muscle tissue.[12]
Cytometry is a technique to measure the properties of individual cells, such as size, shape, and DNA content, which can help diagnose and monitor conditions like cancer or genetic disorders.[13]
Flame emission photometry: a technique to measure the emission of light from a sample excited by a flame, helping to identify and quantify compounds in blood and body fluids.[14]
Nephelometry is a technique to measure the turbidity of a solution, which helps diagnose and monitor conditions like liver disease or kidney failure.[15]
Electrochemical technologies are used to measure the electrical properties of a solution, such as pH, conductivity, and redox potential, which help diagnose and monitor conditions like acid-base disorders or electrolyte imbalances.[16]
Optical sensor technologies: use sensors that detect and measure various properties of a sample using light, such as refractive index or fluorescence, which helps identify and quantify various substances in biological fluids.[17]
Electrophoresis is a technique to separate and analyze proteins in a sample, which helps diagnose and monitor conditions like multiple myeloma or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.[18]
Chromatography is a technique that helps identify and quantify different components in blood and bodily fluids by separating and analyzing compounds in a sample according to their molecular properties, such as size, charge, or shape.[19]
The landscape of clinical laboratory operations has transformed due to the integration of automation, impacting both the analytical and non-analytical aspects. This transition towards automation commenced over 5 decades ago, focusing on automating laboratory test procedures.[20] However, the true leap occurred in the 1990s when non-analytical automation gained momentum, featuring conveyor systems, interfaced analyzers, and automated specimen processing and storage. Automation in the clinical laboratory is classified into 3 categories: manual, stand-alone automation (modular), and total lab automation (TLA).[21]
Automation has a wide-ranging impact, improving laboratory ordering, testing, and reporting processes while eliminating tedious and time-consuming chores.[22] It has ushered in a new era of heightened productivity by streamlining the use of reagents and materials, standardizing operations, and reducing the occurrence of outliers. The efficiency increases production rates and improves accuracy and precision in test results. Automation is a cornerstone in modern clinical laboratories, revolutionizing operations and elevating the overall quality of laboratory testing.[23]
Clinical laboratory specialists perform an array of tasks, including developing and validating new laboratory tests, assessing and defining the analytical and clinical performance, conveying laboratory results to clinicians, offering valuable education and guidance to the clinical team, evaluating the cost-effectiveness and intrinsic value, ensuring strict compliance with regulatory standards, engaging in quality assurance measures, and participating in both basic and clinical research endeavors.[24]
The laboratory professional must maintain the confidentiality of medical information, use resources appropriately, abide by codes of conduct, follow ethical publishing rules, and manage and disclose conflicts of interest.[25]
Providing high-quality diagnostic testing is the goal of all clinical laboratories. Improving laboratory capacity is crucial to address various issues and problems. Managing resources, training, supervision, planning, budgeting, quality assurance, logistics and supply, and biosafety and equipment management are necessary to optimize laboratory services provided to patients.[25]
In 2018, the World Health Organization developed and released the Essential Diagnostics List (EDL). This list was expected to align the health community to the accessibility and availability of high-quality testing of clinical laboratories, especially in resource-limited settings.[26] Using the EDL with essential medicines list (EML), authorities can now focus their efforts so that people receive the necessary laboratory services.[27]
Accreditation for clinical laboratories was recently relevant due to the emergence of international laboratory standards. Several guidelines for laboratories have been developed to regulate laboratory test procedures and maintain their quality.[28] An example of laboratory accreditation is the ISO 15189 provided by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), which focuses on meeting the requirements for the quality and competence of medical laboratories.[29] Another example is biosafety guidelines around microbiological agents such as bacteria, viruses, parasites, and microbiological products.[30]
The need for risk management in clinical laboratories was highlighted to maintain the accuracy and reliability of laboratory tests. The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) developed a guideline to introduce risk management principles specifically in the clinical laboratory.[31] From risk assessment to risk analysis, evaluation, and control to continuous quality improvement, the clinical laboratory should be able to minimize errors along its path of the workflow (ie, preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases). Significant risks such as specimen collection, processing, and disposal of laboratory wastes should be considered.[32]
A laboratory information system (LIS) is valuable in managing results and other pertinent information regarding patients and their samples.[33] The development of a laboratory information system started in the 1960s, concentrating on data reduction, analog-digital conversion, and radioimmunoassay analysis. Recently, the focus has evolved into digital histopathology and genomics, issues about patient access to data, and more.[34] In a rapidly changing environment for the modalities of patient record systems, there is a need for collaboration between clinical systems developers and laboratory-based informaticians to modify and improve the existing technology to meet patient needs.
As the challenges faced by clinical laboratories rise, clinicians should be aware of the impact on their patients. While patients and people in the community are not well aware, the function and mandate of clinical laboratories remain the same: the provision of high-quality laboratory diagnostic tests.
Improving existing laboratory services should not be overlooked when developing newer diagnostic tests.[35] Health authorities at the global level and stakeholders, including clinicians, experts, and other healthcare professionals at the local level, must recognize that clinical laboratories affect the most important clients of healthcare: patients.[36]
In the clinical laboratory setting, the collaborative efforts of various healthcare professionals, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health experts, are instrumental in patient-centered care and outcomes. Nurses play a pivotal role by utilizing their skills in patient advocacy, attention to detail, and specimen collection. They contribute significantly to ethical considerations, ensuring patient confidentiality and dignity in all laboratory procedures. Alongside nurses, allied health professionals and pharmacists exhibit expertise in managing and interpreting laboratory results, informing diagnosis and treatment.
Interprofessional communication is a cornerstone, facilitating seamless critical information exchanges among team members, leading to enhanced care coordination and patient safety. This collaborative approach ensures the timely delivery of laboratory results to clinicians, empowering informed clinical decisions. As a result, the clinical laboratory becomes an integral part of the healthcare ecosystem, promoting patient-centered care, fostering improved team performance, and ultimately elevating patient outcomes.
Plebani M. The changing face of clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999 Jul; 37 (7):711-7. [PubMed : 10510727 ]
Scanlan PM. A Review of Bachelor's Degree Medical Laboratory Scientist Education and Entry Level Practice in the United States. EJIFCC. 2013 Apr; 24 (1):5-13. [PMC free article : PMC4975349 ] [PubMed : 27683433 ]
Lewis SM. Laboratory practice at the periphery in developing countries. Int J Hematol. 2002 Aug; 76 Suppl 1 :294-8. [PubMed : 12430868 ]
Panteghini M. The future of laboratory medicine: understanding the new pressures. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004; 25 (4):207-15. [PMC free article : PMC1934959 ] [PubMed : 18458714 ]
Kotlarz VR. Tracing our roots: origins of clinical laboratory science. Clin Lab Sci. 1998 Jan-Feb; 11 (1):5-7. [PubMed : 10177215 ]
Delwiche FA. Mapping the literature of clinical laboratory science. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Jul; 91 (3):303-10. [PMC free article : PMC164393 ] [PubMed : 12883564 ]
Maxim LD, Niebo R, Utell MJ. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhal Toxicol. 2014 Nov; 26 (13):811-28. [PMC free article : PMC4389712 ] [PubMed : 25264934 ]
Kirk CJ, Shult PA. Developing laboratory networks: a practical guide and application. Public Health Rep. 2010 May-Jun; 125 Suppl 2 (Suppl 2):102-9. [PMC free article : PMC2846809 ] [PubMed : 20518451 ]
Simundic AM, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase--a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22 (2):145-9. [PMC free article : PMC4062337 ] [PubMed : 22838180 ]
Hawkins R. Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Ann Lab Med. 2012 Jan; 32 (1):5-16. [PMC free article : PMC3255486 ] [PubMed : 22259773 ]
Klotz AL, Habibi Y, Corcodel N, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ, Zenthöfer A. Laboratory and clinical reliability of two spectrophotometers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Mar; 34 (2):369-373. [PubMed : 30593733 ]
Delves HT. Atomic absorption spectroscopy in clinical analysis. Ann Clin Biochem. 1987 Nov; 24 ( Pt 6) :529-51. [PubMed : 3322157 ]
McKinnon KM. Flow Cytometry: An Overview. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2018 Feb 21; 120 :5.1.1-5.1.11. [PMC free article : PMC5939936 ] [PubMed : 29512141 ]
Sheikh M, Qassem M, Triantis IF, Kyriacou PA. Advances in Therapeutic Monitoring of Lithium in the Management of Bipolar Disorder. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 19; 22 (3) [PMC free article : PMC8838674 ] [PubMed : 35161482 ]
Pieri M, Pignalosa S, Franceschini L, Rizzo M, Cantonetti M, Zenobi R, Bernardini S, Dessi M. Nephelometric assay of urine free light chains: an alternative and early clinical test for Bence-Jones protein quantification. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Nov 27; 56 (12):e313-e315. [PubMed : 29935112 ]
Hahn CE. Electrochemical analysis of clinical blood-gases, gases and vapours. Analyst. 1998 Jun; 123 (6):57R-86R. [PubMed : 9764506 ]
Pham ATT, Wallace A, Zhang X, Tohl D, Fu H, Chuah C, Reynolds KJ, Ramsey C, Tang Y. Optical-Based Biosensors and Their Portable Healthcare Devices for Detecting and Monitoring Biomarkers in Body Fluids. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 16; 11 (7) [PMC free article : PMC8307945 ] [PubMed : 34359368 ]
Sonagra AD, Dholariya SJ. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jan 13, 2024. Electrophoresis. [PubMed : 36251838 ]
Coskun O. Separation techniques: Chromatography. North Clin Istanb. 2016; 3 (2):156-160. [PMC free article : PMC5206469 ] [PubMed : 28058406 ]
Naugler C, Church DL. Automation and artificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Mar; 56 (2):98-110. [PubMed : 30922144 ]
Archetti C, Montanelli A, Finazzi D, Caimi L, Garrafa E. Clinical Laboratory Automation: A Case Study. J Public Health Res. 2017 Apr 13; 6 (1):881. [PMC free article : PMC5477477 ] [PubMed : 28660178 ]
Brown AS, Badrick T. The next wave of innovation in laboratory automation: systems for auto-verification, quality control and specimen quality assurance. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 27; 61 (1):37-43. [PubMed : 36282956 ]
Yu HE, Lanzoni H, Steffen T, Derr W, Cannon K, Contreras J, Olson JE. Improving Laboratory Processes with Total Laboratory Automation. Lab Med. 2019 Jan 01; 50 (1):96-102. [PubMed : 29982789 ]
Menshikov VV. [The laboratory specialist and clinical interpretation of laboratory results]. Klin Lab Diagn. 2014 May;(5):60-4. [PubMed : 25338467 ]
Taylor JR, Thompson PJ, Genzen JR, Hickner J, Marques MB. Opportunities to Enhance Laboratory Professionals' Role On the Diagnostic Team. Lab Med. 2017 Feb; 48 (1):97-103. [PMC free article : PMC6945980 ] [PubMed : 27744341 ]
Schroeder LF, Guarner J, Amukele TK. Essential Diagnostics for the Use of World Health Organization Essential Medicines. Clin Chem. 2018 Aug; 64 (8):1148-1157. [PubMed : 29871869 ]
Velazquez Berumen A, Garner S, Hill SR, Swaminathan S. Making diagnostic tests as essential as medicines. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3 (4):e001033. [PMC free article : PMC6089269 ] [PubMed : 30116599 ]
Rauch CA, Nichols JH. Laboratory accreditation and inspection. Clin Lab Med. 2007 Dec; 27 (4):845-58, vii. [PubMed : 17950901 ]
Schneider F, Maurer C, Friedberg RC. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189. Ann Lab Med. 2017 Sep; 37 (5):365-370. [PMC free article : PMC5500734 ] [PubMed : 28643484 ]
Bayot ML, Limaiem F. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jan 30, 2023. Biosafety Guidelines. [PubMed : 30725895 ]
Njoroge SW, Nichols JH. Risk management in the clinical laboratory. Ann Lab Med. 2014 Jul; 34 (4):274-8. [PMC free article : PMC4071183 ] [PubMed : 24982831 ]
Jayamani J, Janardan CC, Appan SV, Kathamuthu K, Ahmed ME. A Practical Tool for Risk Management in Clinical Laboratories. Cureus. 2022 Dec; 14 (12):e32774. [PMC free article : PMC9853920 ] [PubMed : 36686107 ]
Srenger V, Stavljenić-Rukavina A, Cvorisćec D, Brkljacić V, Rogić D, Juricić L. [Development of laboratory information system--quality standards]. Acta Med Croatica. 2005; 59 (3):233-9. [PubMed : 16095197 ]
Jones RG, Johnson OA, Batstone G. Informatics and the clinical laboratory. Clin Biochem Rev. 2014 Aug; 35 (3):177-92. [PMC free article : PMC4204239 ] [PubMed : 25336763 ]
Nkengasong JN, Nsubuga P, Nwanyanwu O, Gershy-Damet GM, Roscigno G, Bulterys M, Schoub B, DeCock KM, Birx D. Laboratory systems and services are critical in global health: time to end the neglect? Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Sep; 134 (3):368-73. [PMC free article : PMC7109802 ] [PubMed : 20716791 ]
Caliendo AM, Gilbert DN, Ginocchio CC, Hanson KE, May L, Quinn TC, Tenover FC, Alland D, Blaschke AJ, Bonomo RA, Carroll KC, Ferraro MJ, Hirschhorn LR, Joseph WP, Karchmer T, MacIntyre AT, Reller LB, Jackson AF., Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Better tests, better care: improved diagnostics for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec; 57 Suppl 3 (Suppl 3):S139-70. [PMC free article : PMC3820169 ] [PubMed : 24200831 ]
Disclosure: Marlon Bayot declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: John Lopes declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Muhammad Zubair declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Prisha Naidoo declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
